Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag380kg / 837.76lbs
Weight380g / 13404oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33858 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €249.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012QD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD clearly outshines Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX, offering significantly better performance in total score (9.11 out of 10) and gear ratio (4.9:1). While Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX
