Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
43.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQC 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX clearly outshines Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and durability (7.69 out of 10). While Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX
