Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Daiwa Tanacom 500 edges out Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.04 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 230g / 8,11oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX
