Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Delphin INKS 2000X

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €21.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/400
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX and Delphin INKS 2000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Delphin INKS 2000X stands out for a gear ratio of 5.1:1. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Delphin INKS?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Delphin INKS 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI
