Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Battle III
Spinning
69.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight785g / 27.7oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €127.60
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/335
Conclusion
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX edges out Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (5.3:1) and the total score (6.96 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 230g / 8,11oz and a line retrieve per crank of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Penn Battle III?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Penn Battle III 8000 HSX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X
