Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX and Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX
