Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Levelwind
Multireels
66.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4:9:1
Maximum drag14.9kg / 32,85lbs
Weight500g / 17.64oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €130.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size20 LW
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 290/0.29
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX edges out Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (4:9:1) and the total score (6.63 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs and a ball bearings of 6, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Penn Squall II Levelwind?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
- A gear ratio of 4:9:1 (scoring 6.11 out of 10) gives you a nice middle ground, just enough torque to handle pressure, but still quick enough for general use
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX
