Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
Multireels
91.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1 / 2.0:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1200g / 42.33oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings4 ARB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €307.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II clearly outshines Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.0:1 / 2.0:1) and total score (9.14 out of 10). While Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Tyrnos 30 II is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Shimano Tyrnos 30 II?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Shimano Tyrnos 30 II
- Higher gear ratio of 5.0:1 / 2.0:1 (scoring 9 out of 10), provides more speed meaning a better solution when quick retrieves really count
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
