Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
85.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QC 750X


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX
