Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
85.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
Multireels
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.58:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight800g / 28219oz
Line retireve per crank55 centimeter / 21654 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/500
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX and Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX offers a line retrieve per crank of 99 centimeter / 38.98 inch, while Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000D-CXHX
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99 centimeter / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
