Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €99.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa Tanacom 750
Multireels
77.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.3:1
Maximum drag20kg / 44.09lbs
Weight1260g / 44.45oz
Line retireve per crank42 centimeter / 16.54 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €511.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.41/700
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX and Daiwa Tanacom 750 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX offers a gear ratio of 5.2:1, while Daiwa Tanacom 750 stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Daiwa Tanacom 750?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Shimano Stradic FM vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Shimano Stradic FM vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX
