Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €99.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.41 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight176g / 6.21oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/290
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX
