Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €99.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
48.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank74cm / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/125m
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX
