Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €99.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Cormoran Sportline 2PiF


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX
