Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.74 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €99.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Delphin FRIZ vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Delphin FRIZ


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX
