Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
70.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight315g / 11.11oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €99.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
49.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80cm / 31.50 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.25mm/190m
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX vs Daiwa GS LTD 3000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 HGFJX
