Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT
Spinning
70.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability7.74 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight315g / 11.11oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €99.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the gear ratio (5.1:1). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 545g / 19,22oz and a ergonomics of 5.89 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX
