Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT, 2000S-XH(U), left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10435-205
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT
Spinning
64.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank81 centimeter / 31.89 inch
Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €70.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2000S-XH(U)
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150
Shimano AERO XR, C3000, left and right hand, Feeder fishing reel, Front Drag, AEROXRC3000
Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings5+1

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €114.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeC3000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Conclusion

Shimano AERO XR C3000X edges out Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs) and the total score (8.1 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a line retrieve per crank of 81 centimeter / 31.89 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT and Shimano AERO XR?

There are not much differences between the two comparables