Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT

Spinning

65.70 out of 100

Value for money2.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability3 out of 10

Ergonomics6.23 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight230g / 8.11oz

Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch

Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €77.33
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size4000-C(U)
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa Crossfire LT

Spinning

45.60 out of 100

Value for money3.5 out of 5

Quality classLow

Durability2.68 out of 10

Ergonomics6.27 out of 10

Gear ratio5.2:1

Maximum drag-

Weight220g / 7.76oz

Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch

Ball bearings1

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €30.90
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size1000
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X clearly outshines Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (5). While Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT and Daiwa Crossfire LT?

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X

With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency