Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT
Spinning
65.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €77.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C(U)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (5). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Aero C5000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X
