Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL
Multireels
95.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.9 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag13kg / 28.66lbs
Weight540g / 19.05oz
Line retireve per crank70 centimeter / 27.56 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €699.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.24/400

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (5.1:1) and ball bearings (8). While Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL
- Higher gear ratio of 5.1:1 (scoring 9.2 out of 10), provides more speed meaning a better solution when quick retrieves really count
- Scoring 8.2 out of 10 (540g / 19,05oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- With a retrieve score of 5.71 out of 10 (70 centimeter / 27.56 inch), this reel takes its timeand gives full control during delicate retrieves
- With a high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (8), this reel is built for quick line recovery
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 20IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX
