Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN
Spinning
53.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight300g / 10.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €45.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800
Conclusion
Daiwa TANACOM 800X edges out Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and the durability (5.71 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.3:1 and a weight of 300g / 10,58oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN and Daiwa TANACOM?
Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8 out of 10 (300g / 10,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Delphin INKS 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Delphin HORNET 30X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
