Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Delphin SHARX 3000X

Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN
Spinning
54.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.02 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight295g / 10.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €45.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/200

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/390
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X and Delphin SHARX 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X offers a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch, while Delphin SHARX 3000X stands out for a durability of 7 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN and Delphin SHARX?
Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Delphin SHARX 3000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stradic FM


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Shimano Stradic FM vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Shimano Sahara 2500 R vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 R


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X
