Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X

Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN
Spinning
54.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.02 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight295g / 10.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €45.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/200

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
54.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.09 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight273g / 9.63oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/340
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X and Delphin SHARX 4000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X offers a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch, while Delphin SHARX 4000X stands out for a durability of 7 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN and Delphin SHARX?
Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Delphin SHARX 4000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Shimano Aero C5000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX
