Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW, 2500, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, bespult, Front Drag, 10006-250
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW
Spinning
2500x
62.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €59.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Mitchell MX2 Spinning, 3000, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 1530819
Mitchell MX2 Spinning
Spinning
3000x
63.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.14 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag7.4kg / 16,31lbs
Weight258g / 9.1oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

  • BrandMITCHELL
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €29.60
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.31/125

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X and Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X offers a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, while Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 89 centimeter / 35.04 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW and Mitchell MX2 Spinning?

There are not much differences between the two comparables