Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW, 3000-C, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, bespult, Front Drag, 10006-300
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW
Spinning
3000-cx
63.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €61.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000-C
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Shimano Sedona 8000 FI, Spinning reel with front drag
Shimano Sedona 8000 FI
Spinning
53.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight615g / 21.69oz
Line retireve per crank94cm / 37.00 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing

Technical Specifications

  • BrandSHIMANO
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €75.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size8000
  • Handle typeHandle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.37/275. 0.405/230, 0.47/160 lb/yds: 12/345, 16/250, 20/185

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX and Shimano Sedona 8000 FI perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX offers a weight of 240g / 8,47oz, while Shimano Sedona 8000 FI stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 94cm / 37.00 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW and Shimano Sedona 8000 FI?

There are not much differences between the two comparables