Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT, LT2500-XH, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10005-251
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
69.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €49.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeLT2500-XH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P, left and right hand, Surfcasting Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10711-455
Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P
Seafishing
79.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.7 out of 10
Ergonomics5.61 out of 10
Gear ratio4.1:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight555g / 19.58oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSeafishing
  • Price range~ €209.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size-
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300

Conclusion

Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P edges out Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (6) and the total score (7.96 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Daiwa 23 NINJA LT and Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P?

There are not much differences between the two comparables