Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
69.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 stands out for a durability of 5.73 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 NINJA LT and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Delphin YUPIE vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 500X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX
