Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
69.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the total score (7.96 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a weight of 230g / 8,11oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 NINJA LT and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.47 out of 10 (230g / 8,11oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
