Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
64.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €51.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX and Daiwa TANACOM 1200X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX offers a gear ratio of 5.7:1, while Daiwa TANACOM 1200X stands out for a durability of 5.72 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 NINJA LT and Daiwa TANACOM?
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000CXHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX
