Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
64.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €51.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX and Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX offers a gear ratio of 5.7:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 NINJA LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX
- A fast gear ratio of 9 out of 10 (5.7:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
