Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
69.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX and Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX offers a line retrieve per crank of 93 centimeter / 36.61 inch, while Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX stands out for a durability of 5.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 NINJA LT and Penn Slammer IV?
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX
