Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
69.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €52.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 stands out for a durability of 5.73 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 NINJA LT and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Delphin HORNET 30X


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX
