Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
63.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €51.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/390
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX and Delphin SHARX 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Delphin SHARX 3000X stands out for a durability of 7 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 NINJA LT and Delphin SHARX?
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Delphin SHARX 3000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000D-CX
