Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
63.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €51.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeLT4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX and Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 NINJA LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX
