Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €61.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.37 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight190g / 6.7oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €365.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/170
Conclusion
Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X edges out Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.55 out of 10) and the total score (7.69 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500SFJX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Delphin BRONZ 3000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa BG 3000X
