Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
63.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €69.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch (6.71 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Delphin REDIX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
