Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
63.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €69.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
81.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €181.70
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX edges out Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.6 out of 10) and the total score (8.1 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch (6.71 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Delphin REDIX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X
