Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT, 4000-C, left and right hand, Match And Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10217-405
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
63.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €69.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000-C
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT, LT4000-C, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10005-400
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT
Spinning
63.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €51.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizeLT4000-C
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX offers a gear ratio of 5.2:1, while Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX stands out for a ergonomics of 6.1 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables