Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
63.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €69.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
46.90 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight219g / 7.73oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €94.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/290
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch (6.71 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
