Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
63.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €69.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
59.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio7.0:1
Maximum drag6.8kg / 14,99lbs
Weight323g / 11.39oz
Line retireve per crank112 centimeter / 44.09 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €208.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/280
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX and Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX offers a gear ratio of 5.2:1, while Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- Rated 8.37 out of 10 (285g / 10,05oz) in weight, this reel strikes a great balance between sturdiness and lightness, making it great for consistent feeder casting
- This reel provides steady retrieval 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch (6.71 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
