Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
63.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €69.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX edges out Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.5 out of 10) and the total score (7.76 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT and Shimano Cardiff XR?
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch (6.71 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Delphin IXTREK 4000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD
