Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
63.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €69.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX edges out Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.5 out of 10) and the ball bearings (6). Still, Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX holds its own with strengths like a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs and a line retrieve per crank of 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT and Shimano Ultegra?
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch (6.71 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag
