Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT, 6000SS, left and right hand, Match And Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10217-605
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
62.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.62 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight390g / 13.76oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €75.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size6000SS
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Daiwa Ninja LT, 2500D, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10219-251
Daiwa Ninja LT
Spinning
63.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.87 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €42.00
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500D
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX and Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX offers a line retrieve per crank of 92 centimeter / 36.22 inch, while Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX stands out for a weight of 220g / 7,76oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT and Daiwa Ninja LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables