Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
62.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.62 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight390g / 13.76oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €75.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000SS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A edges out Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.89 out of 10) and the total score (7.96 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.1:1 and a ball bearings of 4, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX
- This reel ensures a smooth and efficient retrieve, great for consistent casting and control in feeder and match fishing
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa TANACOM 1200X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Delphin RAYA body


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X
