Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
55.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
50.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4 kg
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.28mm/220m
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X offers a ball bearings of 4, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82cm / 32.28 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 Revros LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000XGAX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Shimano Sedona 500 FI


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 2000 S-PX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX
