Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
62.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X and Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X offers a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 Revros LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 1000DX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Shimano Stella FK 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X
