Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX and Daiwa TANACOM 800X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX offers a gear ratio of 5.3:1, while Daiwa TANACOM 800X stands out for a durability of 5.71 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 Revros LT and Daiwa TANACOM?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX
