Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Delphin SHARX
Spinning
55.40 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag-
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.95
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/390
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX and Delphin SHARX 3000X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX offers a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, while Delphin SHARX 3000X stands out for a durability of 7 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 Revros LT and Delphin SHARX?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.43 out of 10 (80 centimeter / 31.5 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Delphin SHARX 3000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 4000-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Delphin INKS 5000X


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X
