Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
63.50 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight240g / 8.47oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 edges out Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.73 out of 10) and the total score (7.38 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 240g / 8,47oz and a gear ratio of 5.3:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 23 Revros LT and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.4 out of 10 (240g / 8,47oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Delphin INKS 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX
